Long-term energy usage prediction in public buildings using aggregated modal decomposition and gru

Shao, B; Meng, J and Che, W (2025) Long-term energy usage prediction in public buildings using aggregated modal decomposition and gru. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(8): 04025092, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

According to the Global State of Building and Construction Report 2024, the building sector accounts for one-fifth of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. High energy consumption in buildings is destroying the environment; causing air pollution, the greenhouse effect, and the urban heat island effect; and causing great harm to social and economic development. Public buildings are of great concern due to their high energy consumption per unit area, low energy efficiency, and prominent energy waste. By accurately predicting energy consumption, energy use strategies can be optimized to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption, which helps to reduce carbon emissions from buildings. This is of great significance in addressing global climate change and realizing sustainable development goals. Building energy consumption, as typical time series data, is affected by various factors such as dew point temperature, barometric pressure value, and wind speed. Therefore, how to construct accurate and reliable energy consumption prediction models is an important area of research in the field of construction worth further investigation. This study proposes a method for predicting energy usage using aggregated modal decomposition and gated recurrent units (GRUs). The model is developed by creating a number of smooth component sequences from the original random energy usage time series data, clustering them by the K-shape method, and, in order to predict each internal modal function, the GRU prediction method is adopted. Last, the total prediction is produced by combining the predictions made by each component. In order to demonstrate the accuracy of the prediction algorithm chosen in this study, several comparative studies were conducted, and to verify the generalization of the model, five buildings with different uses were used for the tests. Compared to other models, the model predicted values with minimum values for the error metrics root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error [MAPE (%)], and maximum accuracy (R2).

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise; energy consumption prediction; gated recurrent unit; k -shape; variational mode decomposition
Index terms: global climate change, greenhouse gas, public building, mean square error, prediction method, wind speed, time series, air pollution, economic development, accuracy, prediction model, strategy, urban heat island, sustainable development goal, investigation, comparative study, energy consumption, energy use, clustering, low energy, carbon emission, building energy consumption, efficiency, energy efficiency, greenhouse effect
Subjects: environmental science, climate science, construction type, sustainable design, economic development, prediction and forecasting, energy systems, data analysis and analytics, data science, sustainability and energy, research design and methodology, data collection methods, probability and distributions, professional development, performance management, management
Topics: Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here