Alshboul, O; Shehadeh, A and Saleh, E (2025) Advancing construction quality management: An integrated evidential reasoning and belief functions framework. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(8): 04025093, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Effective quality management in construction projects is relevant but quite difficult because of the dynamic nature of the industry and its complexities. Thereby, traditional quality management systems face immense integration and interpretation difficulties concerning diverse and conflicting data sets that will more likely result in inefficiencies and a heightened risk of errors. This work identifies the knowledge gap and proposes novel evidential reasoning and belief functions framework to enhance the effectiveness of quality assurance and control protocols. Based on Dempster's rule of evidence combination, this framework systematically aggregates and processes observational data and past performance metrics to provide a more robust mathematical foundation for quality management decisions. This approach enables continuous improvements by dynamically updating belief systems with new evidence. It allows for more standardization within projects by providing a consistent method for evaluating and mitigating risks from human error or other quality-related issues. Numerical examples illustrate the framework's functionality; hence, this may alter current quality management practices in construction by providing a more accurate and explicit view of project quality standards and results.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | belief functions; human error risk; quality management |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, aggregate, functionality, integration, quality management, continuous improvement, construction quality, performance metric, standardization, construction project, complexity, quality assurance, face, quality standard, quality management practice, reasoning, evidence, quality management system |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, design features, production management, project delivery, management, organizational analysis, materials science, performance measurement, quality assurance, evaluation and assessment methods, performance management, psychology, cognitive psychology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Research Practice, Quality Management, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here