Integrating a DfMA guideline matrix to facilitate value engineering workshops for construction projects

Zu, F and Zhang, X (2025) Integrating a DfMA guideline matrix to facilitate value engineering workshops for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(7): 04025083, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Conventional value engineering (VE) workshops face challenges in brainstorming effective ideas due to heavy reliance on personal expertise and the difficulty in fully considering downstream factors. In contrast, design for manufacturing and assembly (DfMA) emphasizes the proactive consideration of downstream issues through established guidelines. This paper proposes a systematic framework for integrating DfMA to facilitate VE workshops for construction projects. It starts with a comprehensive literature review to achieve the cross-sectoral learning of DfMA in the construction industry, resulting in the generalization of six construction-tailored DfMA principles. A DfMA guideline matrix (DfMA-GM) is developed by clarifying guidelines along two dimensions, offering a structured approach for their utilization in construction projects. Integrating the matrix into the VE process leads to the proposal of the DfMA-GM-supported VE workshop. The workshop acquires and utilizes the guidelines to facilitate idea generation, transforming the creativity phase into a guideline-driven process. The framework undergoes thorough validation, including application illustration, qualitative evaluation, and quantitative comparison. The findings reveal that the framework of integrating DfMA into VE workshops not only offers a rational and feasible strategy for construction projects but also enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of the idea generation with broad implications.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction project; design for manufacturing and assembly; efficiency and effectiveness; idea generation; value engineering
Index terms: effectiveness, dimension, construction industry, workshop, creativity, efficiency, validation, construction project, proposal, strategy, value engineering, face, literature review
Subjects: industry analysis, professional development, performance management, management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data analysis and analytics, value management, innovation and creative processes, production management, project planning, psychology, construction type
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Project Management, Health and Safety, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here