Modeling framework to quantify and gauge project cost risks due to construction material price volatilities using predictive probabilistic deep-learning algorithms and stochastic risk modeling

Jezzini, Y; Assaad, R H and El-Adaway, I H (2025) Modeling framework to quantify and gauge project cost risks due to construction material price volatilities using predictive probabilistic deep-learning algorithms and stochastic risk modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(7): 04025071, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Material price fluctuations pose significant challenges for executing construction projects and adhering to budgetary estimates. Existing research studies focused on forecasting construction material prices rather than quantifying and gauging overall project cost risks related to price volatilities, and they relied on traditional time-series forecasting methods that are incapable of offering full probabilistic distributions of price fluctuations and of providing a comprehensive assessment of risk uncertainties associated with material price fluctuations. This paper addresses these gaps by developing an integrated framework to quantify and gauge project risks due to construction material price volatilities. The framework's validity and practicality were demonstrated using real-world projects with various characteristics and different market conditions, including an 11-month bridge replacement project and a 25-month major roadway project. Historical Producer Price Index (PPI) values were collected for four construction materials: steel reinforcement, asphalt, aggregate, and concrete. Three probabilistic deep-learning models - deep autoregressive models, probabilistic feed-forward neural networks, and transformers - were developed to forecast PPI probabilistic distributions. The performance of the developed models was evaluated using probabilistic metrics, and the top-performing models were identified for each material and were compared with a baseline artificial neural network model and a Bayesian prophet model. Finally, stochastic risk models were developed to integrate the predicted distributions into the price escalation clauses of standard construction contracts (i.e., FIDIC) to model risk uncertainties and plot stochastic risk profiles. The findings provided valuable insights about patterns and fluctuations in prices across various construction materials, market volatilities, extreme events, and different types of clauses, including "any-increase escalation clauses"and "threshold escalation clauses."This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on construction material price escalation by offering a comprehensive approach that provides project parties with data-driven insights that inform strategies to mitigate financial setbacks resulting from price fluctuations and volatilities in their projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction materials; deep learning; price escalation clauses; price fluctuations; probabilistic forecasting; stochastic risk modeling
Index terms: market condition, neural network, strategy, project cost, learning algorithm, artificial neural network, project party, body of knowledge, replacement, construction project, FIDIC, aggregate, deep learning, validity, extreme event, forecasting, estimate, modelling, reinforcement, construction material, construction contract
Subjects: environmental hazards, algorithms, production management, knowledge management, analytical methods, evaluation and assessment methods, contract type, standard forms of contract, materials science, sociology, management, economics, building materials, modelling and simulation, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, prediction and forecasting, economic and policy analysis
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Sustainability, Project Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here