Identifying desirable safety actions of upper management to foster higher levels of construction safety culture

Al-Bayati, A J and Chellappa, V (2025) Identifying desirable safety actions of upper management to foster higher levels of construction safety culture. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(7): 04025077, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Upper management serves as the originator of safety culture within construction firms. Although the role of upper management is crucial to construction site safety, its specific actions in promoting a superior safety culture are under-researched and need further examination. This study uses a mixed research methodology to identify and rank key actions that upper management can take to enhance organizational safety culture. Specifically, a Delphi method involving 21 experts and a subsequent survey methodology of 113 construction professionals were utilized. Accordingly, 17 key actions were identified and grouped into three categories: leadership; resources and funding; and communication. The findings indicate that the most crucial action upper management can take is demonstrating its commitment to safety through concrete actions. The research also emphasizes the importance of upper management collaborating with and empowering frontline supervisors as safety champions. Building a robust construction firm safety culture and project climate is essential for ensuring the well-being of workers and the success of any project. This cannot be achieved without a clearly defined list of desirable safety actions. Few studies, if any, have focused on the desirable safety actions of upper management. As a result, this study contributes valuable insights to the field, providing practical guidance for the industry and deepening our understanding of how upper management can effectively foster a positive firm safety culture and project safety climate as well as assess their safety contribution.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety culture; construction safety management; project safety climate; safety action evaluation
Index terms: safety culture, Delphi method, organizational safety culture, research methodology, funding, construction professional, supervisor, safety climate, construction firm, survey, construction site, commitment, methodology, well-being, key action, construction safety
Subjects: economic analysis, psychology, practitioner, organization, health safety and environment, research methods, work location, control systems, data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing, research design and methodology, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, professional development
Topics: Health and Safety, Project Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here