Cooperative game theory approach towards capital equipment procurement in construction projects: a concrete batch plant case study

Rouhparvar, M; Babaei, F and Navidi, H (2025) Cooperative game theory approach towards capital equipment procurement in construction projects: a concrete batch plant case study. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(8), pp. 899-910. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This study explores how contractors can benefit from joint resource procurement in construction projects, particularly in case with capital-intensive ones. Capital equipment is costly and has a long beneficial life compared to other resources; hence, minimizing its long-term costs is pivotal. Also, the lack of open dialogue under a legal structure in projects may deprive project participants from many beneficial partnering opportunities. Given this background, a comprehensive framework based on cooperative game theory is introduced to form a systematic partnership among contracting parties to share their capital equipment. Cooperative game theory is suggested as the basis for increase the gains to all parties and fair and efficient allocation of the incremental benefits of cooperation. The proposed flowchart is then applied to a real-world project and various coalitional cooperative game theory solutions for dividing gains equitably, from sharing a site-located concrete batch plant among three contractors are evaluated and the most stable cost allocation is identified. Results reveal that with the application of this cooperative procurement, the three contractors can achieve an average of twenty three percent considerable savings through practical alliance that deliver vast improvements in project productivity and performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concrete batch plant; cooperative game theory; cooperative procurement; joint resource management; partnering; transferable utility coalitional game
Index terms: game theory, construction project, cooperation, case study, partnering, savings, contracting party, partnership, productivity, resource management
Subjects: partnership management, management, decision models, control systems, data collection methods, production management, economic analysis, psychology, practitioner
Topics: Project Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here