Warrier, G A and Palaniappan, S (2025) Uncertainty in the embodied energy assessment of buildings: a case of EWS type low-cost house in India. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(8), pp. 911-922. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Studies on embodied energy of buildings often present results as a single-point estimate without considering the variability in input parameters and the uncertainty it poses on results. Uncertainty analysis is useful to improve the reliability of results. This study examines uncertainty in the embodied energy of a single-storey EWS type residential building due to variability in the embodied energy intensity of materials and material wastage factors. Data quality indicator (DQI) based semi-qualitative method is used for modelling the variability in input parameters. Monte Carlo Simulation is used for uncertainty propagation. The building embodied energy is found to vary from 4 to 9 GJ/m2 based on variation in input data. The mean building embodied energy is found to be 6.3 GJ/m2. The embodied energy intensity of materials is found to cause more variation in building embodied energy in comparison with mass of materials. 'Brick' is identified as the significant key parameter based on the relative contribution to uncertainty and embodied energy at the building level. Cement and rebar are identified as key parameters. The DQI based methodology presented in this study is useful for Life Cycle Assessment practitioners to evaluate uncertainty in the embodied energy assessment of residential buildings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | embodied energy; housing for all; life cycle assessment; low-cost house; residential building; uncertainty analysis; variability |
| Index terms: | qualitative method, life cycle assessment, housing, practitioner, methodology, variation, Monte Carlo simulation, uncertainty analysis, residential building, variability, embodied energy, estimate, modelling, India, rebar, quality indicator, propagation |
| Subjects: | engineering process, research design and methodology, building materials, modelling and simulation, energy systems, financial and cost management, project delivery, contractual condition, statistical analysis, construction type, environmental impact, practitioner, analytical methods, research methods, Geography, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Contract Administration, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here