Conceptualizing the phenomenon of construction industrialization: linking theory and practice through a cross-sector case study

Costa, S; Sameiro Carvalho, M; Pimentel, C and Duarte, C (2025) Conceptualizing the phenomenon of construction industrialization: linking theory and practice through a cross-sector case study. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(8), pp. 923-931. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This study examines the intersection between Practitioner and Academic perspectives on the Construction Industrialization (CI) phenomenon. The goal was to understand the prevailing perspectives of how CI is perceived, how it is performed, and what benefits it is expected to offer. The study begins with a literature review, followed by an exploratory multiple-case study encompassing the Architecture, Engineering, Traditional Construction, and Manufactured Construction sectors. Within-case and cross-case analyses were performed, leading to 10 new insights that elaborate the theoretical understanding of the phenomenon. An important conclusion is the criticism of the interchangeable terms of Off-site Production, Modular Construction, or Prefabricated Construction as being insufficient to conceptualize CI across the four sectors. This article proposes a more comprehensive conceptualization that challenges current definitions. It distinguishes between the Constructive System and the Productive System; it redirects the CI theory toward a constant process of technical and sociocultural change; and it emphasizes the importance of societal sustainable development beyond productivity. This article represents the first attempt to conceptualize the CI phenomenon bridging the theory-practice gap. It seeks to stimulate further research and create new debates about the phenomenon.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; conceptualization; construction industrialization; construction industry; cross-case analysis; definition; modular construction
Index terms: off-site production, construction industry, traditional construction, case study, productivity, modular construction, cross-case analysis, practitioner, construction sector, literature review, sustainable development, industrialization
Subjects: industry analysis, management, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, building construction, heritage and conservation, economic development, manufacturing engineering, health safety and environment, practitioner
Topics: Sustainability, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here