Pandey, S; Paudel, S; Devkota, K; Kshetri, K and Asteris, P G (2025) Machine learning unveils the complex nonlinearity of concrete materials' uniaxial compressive strength. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(6), pp. 635-649. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Uniaxial compressive strength (CS), a mechanical property that depends on the type of fine and coarse aggregates, the water-cement (w/c) ratio, age, the volume of admixtures, etc., is difficult to estimate for concrete materials. Hence, an investigation on the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to predict the UCS of concrete precisely and affordably is described here. Different machine learning algorithms, including ensemble models like Classification and regression trees (CART), XGBoost (XGB), Bagging (Bagg), AdaBoost (AdaBo) and Random Forest Regression (RF), and non-ensemble models like Ridge regression (RR), Partial least square (PLS), K-Nearest Neighbors algorithm (KNN) were used. A total of 1206 experimental results datasets were collected. The key input parameters for the soft computing method, which produces the CS of concrete as the output, are composed of nine different elements. The quantity of cement, fine and coarse aggregate, amount of water, plasticizer, slump, and days of curing are some of the major input components. By comparing the ML-derived results with the experimental findings using various performance indices, the study demonstrates that the XGBoost model effectively approximates the CS of concrete materials with reliability and robustness. Furthermore, the research includes sensitivity analysis based on the developed optimal XGBoost model, revealing the influence of different concrete mix parameters on CS and highlighting the strongly nonlinear nature of concrete materials.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | compressive strength; machine learning; non-ensemble and ensemble algorithms; sensitivity analysis; xgboost |
| Index terms: | curing, computing, admixture, partial least square, machine learning, dataset, sensitivity analysis, forest, compressive strength, mechanical property, investigation, estimate, aggregate |
| Subjects: | computing systems, data collection methods, financial and cost management, artificial intelligence, material properties and characteristics, concrete and cementitious materials, statistical analysis, data management, materials science, environmental science, material analysis and testing, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Research Practice, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here