Developing a framework for mitigating pilfering: a case study of selected Nigeria's construction sites via soft system methodology

Ebekozien, A; Aigbavboa, C; Samsurijan, M S and Thwala, W D (2025) Developing a framework for mitigating pilfering: a case study of selected Nigeria's construction sites via soft system methodology. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(6), pp. 672-681. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Studies regarding mitigating pilfering practices on construction sites via a framework are scarce in Nigeria. Hence, this research explored the root cause of pilfering practices on Nigeria's construction sites and developed a framework to mitigate the unethical practices. This research employed a soft system methodology (SSM) to understand pilfering practices on construction sites in Nigeria. The mechanism permits an alternative method to mitigate pilfering practices on construction sites via a developed framework. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with practitioners in alignment with the SSM seven steps, and findings were presented. The study engaged six construction sites in Lagos, Nigeria. Findings show that besides evidence of pilfering practices across the selected construction sites, the absence of a framework to mitigate pilfering practices on construction sites, especially in small and medium construction firms' sites, threatens value-driven construction projects in Nigeria. The study's findings developed a framework that would enhance the concept of post-contract cost control and reduction of construction overhead costs during the execution phase of projects through mitigating pilfering practices on construction sites. This is a germane mechanism for meeting clients' and contractors' requirements and satisfaction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; construction site; face-to-face interviews; framework; Nigeria; pilfering
Index terms: practitioner, evidence, methodology, cost control, construction project, interview, construction firm, face, construction site, Lagos, unethical practices, case study, satisfaction, Nigeria
Subjects: project delivery, financial and cost management, work location, data collection methods, production management, Geography, research methods, ethical practice, psychology, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, organization
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here