Musonda, I; Zulu, S L; Zulu, E and Kavishe, N (2025) Understanding clients' role in community stakeholder participation and influence on infrastructure sustainability—a stakeholder theory lens. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(4), pp. 419-427. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The nature of project clients and implementing agents is crucial to Local community stakeholder (LCS) participation in infrastructure development. However, few studies have explored this relationship. The questions regarding clients' and implementing agents' nature remain under-explored. Therefore, this article uses stakeholder theory to investigate the clients' values and stakeholder participation in infrastructure development. A qualitative method used interviews with professionals from clients, consulting organisations and stakeholders to collect data in South Africa. The study revealed that LCS participation was related to client organisation's values and nature. Equally, the stakeholder participation level influenced delivery of sustainable infrastructure. The significance of the study is that it reveals the gap in stakeholder management, an area extensively studied. Moreover, the study compels project sponsors and researchers to consider factors in clients' and implementing agents' organisations to improve stakeholder participation. The study redirects attention to client organisations' nature and demonstrates the need for the right organisational attitude if stakeholder participation and sustainable infrastructure delivery are to be realised. This study may have important implications for policy and practice regarding stakeholder participation and sustainable infrastructure. However, limitations should be noted regarding the sample size.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | clients; community; infrastructure; stakeholder theory; stakeholders; sustainability |
| Index terms: | agent, South Africa, stakeholder management, interview, project client, project sponsor, qualitative method, infrastructure development, client organization, infrastructure delivery, stakeholder participation, infrastructure sustainability, sample size |
| Subjects: | participation process, community and social dimensions, research design and methodology, data collection methods, sociology, strategic project management, practitioner, client relations, sustainable engineering, infrastructure engineering, Geography |
| Topics: | Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here