van Heerden, A; Boulic, M; McDonald, B W and Chawynski, G (2025) Gender-perceived workplace stressors by New Zealand construction professionals. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(3), pp. 289-300. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The construction workplace is male-dominated and stressful, but little is known about gender-based differences in its stressors. This research examined the effect of gender and personal attributes on stressors in the New Zealand construction industry at four major levels: (1) individual, (2) group, (3) organizational, and (4) extra-organizational. Target respondents were professional construction members from Site Safe New Zealand, with 317 completed questionnaires and statistical analysis using the two-sample t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Levene's test. The findings show that females have higher qualifications than males, but males have about ten years more experience and more completed projects than their female counterparts. Males reported significantly higher technical skills than females and there was no significant difference between genders regarding sector involvement. At the individual level, females were most affected by role conflict stress and the perception of different treatment because of gender. Males felt significantly higher stress over the variable 'on/off-site office/administration building conditions'. At the group level, there were no significant gender differences, but sexual harassment warranted further investigation. Within the organizational and extra-organizational levels, no variables differed significantly between genders. The construction workforce has a strong gender imbalance and efforts are needed to address this through better work-life balance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | gender; personal attributes; stressor levels; questionnaire |
| Index terms: | role conflict, questionnaire, stressors, technical skill, construction industry, work-life balance, construction professional, investigation, statistical analysis, qualification, building condition, New Zealand |
| Subjects: | educational resources, Geography, asset management, management, professional development, sociology, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, data collection methods, data science |
| Topics: | Education, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here