Gouda Mohamed, A and Hathout, T (2025) Reinvigorating the process of contractor selection in adaptive reuse projects: a novel decision-making and evaluation paradigm. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(2), pp. 171-181. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Adaptive reuse projects reconfigure and revitalize existing buildings to enact an alternative purpose, diverging from the original design intent. The study introduces a novel decision-making framework that adopts the Ordinary Priority Approach (OPA) based on the integrated Relative Performance Index (RPI) for selecting and appraising contractors in adaptive reuse projects. Current methodologies lack criteria and assessment approaches tailored to the prototypical challenges of adaptive reuse projects, compelling special knowledge, skills, structural design considerations, sustainable methods, and prudent resource conservation. Accordingly, this research aims to 1) Identify and evaluate primary Contractor Selection Criteria (CSc) and their sub-criteria influencing contractor choice for adaptive reuse; 2) Rank sub-CSc using the Relative Importance Index (RII); 3) Assign weights to sub-CSc via the OPA, and 4) Examine the contractors' performance using the RPI method. By offering this framework, this paper enhances and empowers decision-making processes to opt for contractors with the requisite expertise and competencies for successful adaptive reuse projects, filling a crucial knowledge gap. Six contractors were selected to assess the feasibility and validate the proposed framework. Among the chosen contractors, numbers 2, 4, and 5 exhibited significant performance concerning the top-ranked sub-CSc, registering RPI values of 1, 0.88, and 0.86, respectively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive reuse projects; contractor selection criteria; decision-making approach; ordinary priority approach; relative importance index |
| Index terms: | resource conservation, relative importance index, decision-making, methodology, structural design, contractor selection, decision-making process, adaptive reuse, paradigm |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, architectural engineering, education and knowledge transfer, decision analysis, sustainable design, research methods, tendering |
| Topics: | Procurement, Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here