Policy network evaluation of China's rental housing market from the perspective of text measurement

Guo, X; Tian, J; Zhang, S and Zhang, Y (2025) Policy network evaluation of China's rental housing market from the perspective of text measurement. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(2), pp. 182-193. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

In recent years, the Chinese government has gradually paid attention to the development of the rental housing market and began to issue a large number of relevant policies by the central and local governments in 2016. In view of the lack of systematic evaluation of rental housing market policy in China, this study constructed an interdependent multi-layer network of 'policy objective-policy instrument-issuing department-stakeholder' from the perspective of text measurement, and used network indexes to measure the global features of the four-dimensional sub-policy network and the differential characteristics of the network evolution process, the results are as follows: (i) The four policy instruments in the network of policy instruments, namely, instruction, supply leading, management system and management system reform, are leaders in the network. (ii) The absolute central node in the policy objective network is to increase the effective supply of rental housing. (iii) The central nodes in the issuing department network are housing development department and the land department. (iv) Market subject and public are the central clusters in the stakeholder network. (v) The network nodes of stakeholder policy instruments have the strongest correlation, and there are three clusters with obvious spatial distance segmentation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: coupling relation; evolution mechanism; policy network evaluation; rental housing market; text measurement
Index terms: local government, management system, housing development, evolution, stakeholder network, China, housing, policy instrument, coupling, land
Subjects: administrative law, systems engineering, management, participation process, real estate economics, Geography, environmental science, construction type, policy studies
Topics: Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Governance
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here