Hassan Ali, A; Farouk Kineber, A; Elshaboury, N; Arashpour, M and Osama Daoud, A (2025) Analysing multifaceted barriers to modular construction in sustainable building projects: a comprehensive evaluation using multi-criteria decision making. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(1), pp. 1-17. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Modular construction (MC) is recognized as pivotal for sustainable development in developed countries. However, its implementation faces barriers in residential projects in developing nations. This study aims to address the knowledge gap resulting from the limited uptake of MC in residential projects, mainly attributed to existing barriers. To accomplish this goal, a questionnaire survey was conducted to assess the significance of thirty adoption barriers. Subsequently, an exploratory factor analysis method was applied to categorize these barriers, followed by their assessment and ranking using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. A novel aggregation and ranking method that integrates the WASPAS and TOPSIS techniques for order preference, by similarity to an ideal solution approach, was employed. The rankings derived from different decision-making methods were combined using an ensemble approach based on half-quadratic theory. Our findings reveal that the adoption barriers can be grouped into five main categories, with cost, coordination, and standards emerging as the most prominent barriers. They are followed by technical and practical barriers, inflexibility and supply chain barriers, abilities and awareness barriers, and societal and desire-related barriers. The study results offer significant insights into the barriers impeding MC adoption in developing countries' construction sectors, providing recommendations to improve its uptake.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developing countries; ensemble approach; exploratory factor analysis; fuzzy synthetic evaluation; modular construction barriers; offsite construction; questionnaire |
| Index terms: | face, sustainable development, developing nation, survey, developing country, exploratory factor analysis, fuzzy synthetic evaluation, construction sector, preference, decision-making, modular construction, sustainable building, residential project, questionnaire, developed country, topsis, implementation, coordination |
| Subjects: | psychology, contractual arrangements, building construction, decision-making and optimization, decision-making and reasoning, economic development, sustainable construction, development economics, health safety and environment, data collection methods, decision analysis, statistical analysis, industry analysis, management |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, International Construction, Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here