Nguyen, V T; Do, S T; Tran, C N N and Aung, Z M (2025) Developing a Bayesian belief network model for quantifying and predicting claim causes-related schedule delays. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(1), pp. 32-45. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Nowadays, construction claims have become an inevitable part of the construction project, and they have a serious impact on the project schedule. This study aims to develop a Bayesian belief network (BBN) model for quantifying and predicting claim cause-related schedule delays in Vietnam. Based on data from survey questionnaires and interviews with experts, 23 critical claim causes of construction project schedule delays and 17 significant cause-effect relationship pairs were found and used to build the BBNs models. The results obtained from the BBNs models are good at quantifying the probability of schedule delays in three different case study projects. In the case study of a transportation project, for example, there is a major delay of 34 months, which is about 38.64% of the original length of the project. The model predicted that there is a 69% chance that the project's schedule delay will be more than 20% of the original length. Using these BBNs models, industry practitioners can prevent claim causes-related schedule delays early. This approach is general and can be applied to any construction project in other countries with small adjustments, especially in the case of developing countries similar to Vietnam.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bayesian belief networks; claims; construction projects; schedule delays; Vietnam; questionnaire |
| Index terms: | case study, schedule delay, survey, bayesian belief network, transportation project, Vietnam, developing country, interview, construction claim, practitioner, questionnaire, construction project |
| Subjects: | Geography, production management, development economics, practitioner, infrastructure and transport systems, project controls, payment, probabilistic model, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, International Construction, Digital Applications, Time Control, Contract Administration, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here