Chen, X; Chang-Richards, A; Ling, F Y Y; Yiu, T W; Pelosi, A and Yang, N (2025) Digital technologies in the AEC sector: A comparative study of digital competence among industry practitioners. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(1), pp. 63-76. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The successful implementation of digital technologies (DT) in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) projects necessitates workflow adjustment, crew scheduling, equipment optimization, and efficient collaboration among project parties. Understanding the digital capabilities of industry professionals is essential for the effective deployment of DT. This paper examines the competence of AEC practitioners in 14 types of DT through a questionnaire survey involving 428 participants. Descriptive statistics, including mean scores and standard deviations, were calculated to understand the competence levels of different DT. Specific inferential statistical tests, such as chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests investigated disparities in competence across different business types, operational years, and company sizes. The results indicate that cloud technology, global positioning systems, and building information modeling were predominantly recognized and utilized, whereas blockchain remained underexplored. Notably, building contractors, small and medium-sized enterprises, and start-ups lagged behind their counterparts in digital competence, with large-scale enterprises exhibiting better knowledge but limited implementation of DT. The findings underscore the need for targeted upskilling efforts to harness DT knowledge effectively and manage digital resources within organizations undergoing digital transformation. The research contributes to the literature on digital competence within the AEC sector and sets the stage for further research into effective DT adoption and deployment interventions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | comparative analysis; digital competence; digital technology; knowledge; practice; questionnaire |
| Index terms: | competence, collaboration, practitioner, questionnaire, digital technology, workflow, statistical test, scheduling, comparative analysis, survey, project party, comparative study, implementation, disparity, statistics, blockchain, building information modelling, building contractor, deviation, transformation |
| Subjects: | social justice, contractual arrangements, operations research, practitioner, information systems, statistical analysis, sociology, personnel development, management, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, computing systems, business, mathematical modelling, research design and methodology, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Time Control, Procurement, Ethics |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here