Bruun, E P G (2024) Structural scaffold-free cooperative robotic fabrication. PhD thesis, Princeton University, USA.
Abstract
Robotic automation has the potential to revolutionize the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry by enabling novel construction processes for geometrically complex structures. Cooperative Robotic Fabrication (CRF) involves coordinating multiple robots to work together on construction tasks beyond the capabilities of individual robots. This dissertation explores the use of CRF methods for assembling, disassembling, and reusing discrete element structures. The key innovation lies in developing and physically demonstrating computational methods that enable teams of robotic arms to work together. These methods allow the robotic arms to precisely coordinate their actions to ensure structural stability is maintained during construction without needing external supports or scaffolding. The dissertation begins with assembly-only applications and extends to more complex tasks involving structural disassembly and reuse. It starts with a bottom-up human-robot design framework where two cooperating robots help design branching spatial structures in pseudo real-time, using path-planning constraints in collaboration with human decision-making. Next, CRF is demonstrated for constructing spanning masonry structures. Here, the structure is modeled as a lumped spring system, and multiple robots are sequenced in either a sequential, cantilever, or optimized manner to ensure the stability of the central arch during construction without external scaffolding. Next, a resource-informed approach is demonstrated for designing space frame structures. This approach uses rigidity theory and Henneberg planar graph assembly steps to sequentially design and build rigid space frame structures that are specifically intended for scaffold-free assembly and disassembly using a CRF setup. Finally, CRF is applied to the scaffold-free disassembly and reuse of an existing structure, aligning with circular economy principles by minimizing material waste and enabling reuse. A novel graph-based method utilizing the concept of structural support hierarchy is developed to isolate affected members within the structure. By unrolling the resulting subgraphs, this method generates sequences for removing members without compromising the integrity of the remaining structure. This dissertation demonstrates that multiple robots working together can be utilized in previously unexplored construction scenarios, involving diverse materials, scales, and discrete element structural typologies. These practical demonstrations introduce novel cooperative robotic scaffold-free assembly, disassembly, and reuse methods to the AEC industry.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Adriaenssens, S and Parascho, S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automation; circular economy; collaboration; fabrication; innovation; masonry; reuse; robotic |
| Index terms: | integrity, circular economy, frame structure, automation, dissertation, fabrication, scaffolding, stability, design framework, disassembly, masonry structure, design and build, decision-making, construction process, collaboration |
| Subjects: | research dissemination and communication, operations management, contractual arrangements, manufacturing engineering, structural engineering, automation and robotics, health safety and environment, sustainable design, building construction, management, design practice, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here