New insights on the roman brick industry: The production and distribution of ceramic building material in central Italy (ca. 50 bce-300 CE)

Cha, C (2024) New insights on the roman brick industry: The production and distribution of ceramic building material in central Italy (ca. 50 bce-300 CE). PhD thesis, Florida State University, USA.

Abstract

Brick represents a class of archaeological artifacts most commonly found across ancient Roman sites. The Romans favored ceramic building material for its durability and adaptability to architectural forms. The most impressive monuments of ancient Rome, still standing today, were built on a lasting foundation of fired brick. Natural claybeds were abundant in the vicinity of Rome, allowing the continuous manufacture of brick in large quantities to meet the growing demand, both in the capital and in the territories under its influence. The brick industry, in tandem with the construction industry, was one of the most important businesses in ancient Rome. A readily available supply of brick was necessary for the construction and maintenance of entire towns and cities following the increasing standardization of Roman building practices across an expanding empire.This dissertation delves into an ongoing discourse on the brick industry in Rome in connection to a developing regional trade network. In particular, focus will be given to the organization and impact of the brick industry in Rome and in cities within its immediate periphery. The evidence of brick stamps found at Cosa and Gabii demonstrates two similar, yet ultimately diverging practices of brick acquisition. Regulatory changes in the industry affected the distribution strategies of commercial brick both within Rome and for the cities connected to its markets by trade ties.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: De Giorgi, A U
Uncontrolled Keywords: Italy; durability; markets; standardization
Index terms: construction industry, markets, dissertation, standardization, building material, durability, Rome, monument, acquisition, building practice, adaptability, Italy, evidence, artifact, strategy
Subjects: research dissemination and communication, evaluation and assessment methods, user focus, economic analysis, architectural elements, Geography, building construction, business, building materials, material degradation and durability, management, performance measurement, sociology, industry analysis
Topics: Quality Management, Geographical Context, Design Practice, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here