Elzibak, A (2025) Coastal storms and building code adoption: Motivators and impacts 1979-2022. PhD thesis, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, USA.
Abstract
This thesis investigates the piecemeal adoption of the International Building Code (IBC) by individual states and the related repercussions with respect to coastal hazards of high winds, storm surge, and rainfall in the period 1979-2022 for states along America’s Eastern seaboard and the Gulf of Mexico. Specifically, storm impacts are considered in terms of resulting deaths and property damage. This work highlights extremely inconsistent IBC adoption (spatially and temporally) across the United States (US) and how this has contributed to unprecedented losses nearing 2% of America’s gross domestic product. The work also underscores the insufficiency of the code in addressing rain and storm surge effects with respect to protecting people and property. The thesis further demonstrates a persistent lag in the timely and uniform adoption of the IBC in much of the US and establishes the relative statistical significance of impacts of the newer versions of the code in reducing damage costs and loss of life. In addition, this thesis highlights the problematic cycle of more severe and frequent storms (i.e. those producing more than 1 billion dollars in damage or at least one death), while IBC code changes remain reactive.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Laefer, D F |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Mexico; United States; gross domestic product; hazards |
| Index terms: | rain, motivator, gross domestic product, storm surge, building code, United States, rainfall, Mexico |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, psychology, climate science, environmental hazards, Geography, regulatory law |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Geographical Context, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here