Lynch, Ellen (2024) Humility as a professional engineering asset: An analysis of humble behaviour in the Australian engineering workforce. PhD thesis, Australian National University, Australia.
Abstract
Engineers are an integral part of solving key social, environmental and technical challenges faced at local, domestic and international levels. These problems require engineers to work collaboratively across diverse knowledge, experience, cultures and background. Achieving productive collaboration requires enhanced interpersonal skills, attributes and attitudes in areas such as communication, empathy and teamwork. While the importance and prevalence of these in engineering has been studied, the entwined trait of humility has not. Humility is a practice that promotes positive relationships, accountability, communication and authentic collaboration. This thesis investigates experiences and perceptions of humility in the Australian engineering workplace. Qualitative interviews of mid-career engineers were coded thematically, revealing humility is an important aspect of workplace relations. Numerous prevalent behaviours of humility emerged, including seeking and valuing others' perspectives, admitting fault, shared decision making and showing appreciation. These humble behaviours help build trust, respect and rapport with colleagues and clients, positively impacting workplace relationships and activities. Behaviours and their associated contexts were analysed through two developed themes: humility's role in modulating power relations, and its interconnectivity with care. This exploratory study demonstrates humility is a valuable yet invisible part of professional engineering practice in Australia that requires greater attention. Humility is an exciting avenue for further study and consideration in tertiary and industry environments to promote positive collaboration and workplace relationships.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Smith, J |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; accountability; collaboration; communication; decision making; professional; skills; teamwork; trust; workforce |
| Index terms: | collaboration, career, decision-making, interpersonal skill, interview, tertiary, accountability, exploratory study, teamwork, Australia, engineer |
| Subjects: | human factors and perception, curriculum development, Geography, research methods, liability law, profession, data collection methods, professional development, management, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Legal Issues, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here