Development of safety leading and lagging indicators framework for contractor selection in construction projects

Razak, N A (2024) Development of safety leading and lagging indicators framework for contractor selection in construction projects. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, UK.

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate contractor is a crucial phase that clients normally conduct to execute projects. For the past few decades, it was found that many selection decisions lean towards accepting the lowest bid offers, which causes many problems during the construction stage. Extensive research has been conducted on the main contractor selection criteria, such as financial stability, technical and management capability. This thesis focuses generally on health and safety criteria, specifically leading and lagging indicators that are underexplored besides the aforementioned criteria. Therefore, a systematic review of 38 empirical studies was conducted to analyse the existing literature on health and safety prequalification criteria for contractor selection in construction. Six main themes were discovered to represent safety prequalification criteria for construction projects, namely experience and work history, safety control system, safety policy and management, accident rates and records, safety promotion and environmental concerns. Under these six main themes, 25 safety prequalification criteria have been substantially published in previous literature, with the most cited criteria being health and safety records. It was found out there is a gap in determining safety leading and lagging indicators in contractor selection. These indicators may help clients in selecting safe contractors and contribute significant impacts to the project outcomes. Following this systematic literature review, the aim of this research was formulated, which is to improve the existing contractor selection procedure in Malaysia by introducing a framework that integrates safety leading and lagging indicators as part of the contractor selection criteria towards creating safer construction sites, while taking into account the challenges posed by the recent disease outbreak. In order to achieve the aim and the research objectives, a qualitative research approach is adopted. 13 semi-structured interviews were conducted with Malaysian construction professionals who have vast experience in the construction industry and are involved in the contractor selection process. The result shows that there are 10 leading indicators and 5 lagging indicators that can be integrated into the contractor selection criteria. The study identified four significant impacts of utilising leading and lagging indicators for contractor selection process, namely increase in quality of work, effect on project completion time, minimising the additional cost of the project, and increase in safety awareness. A framework that incorporates safety leading and lagging indicators into the contractor selection process has been developed, which is then validated by six experts. This framework was specifically developed to address health and safety criteria in general, with keen interest in the potential challenges posed by disease outbreaks in Malaysia. This framework introduces a novel approach by integrating both safety leading and lagging indicators into the contractor selection. This unique combination has not been extensively explored before in the Malaysian construction industry, thus contributing new perspective in improving construction safety practices. In addition, by incorporating both leading and lagging indicators, this framework offers a more comprehensive and thorough evaluation of contractors' safety performance, which in turn can minimise risk of accidents at construction sites. Finally, this framework also contributes insights into adapting safety measures to unexpected situations, like the Covid-19 pandemic.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Fenn, P and Ejohwomu, O
Uncontrolled Keywords: COVID-19; Malaysia; construction safety; contractor selection; control system; health and safety; policy; prequalification; qualitative research; safety; selection criteria; systematic literature review
Index terms: interview, stability, outbreak, construction project, project outcome, safety performance, systematic literature review, Malaysia, main contractor, construction industry, qualitative research, health and safety, promotion, control system, selection criteria, completion time, contractor selection, safety measures, construction professional, pandemic, construction safety, environmental concern, construction site, history, COVID-19, empirical study
Subjects: environmental issues, structural engineering, Geography, research methods, research design and methodology, practitioner, tendering, project completion, professional development, environmental health, monitoring and control, industry analysis, production management, occupational health and safety management, research evaluation and metrics, work location, health safety and environment, health risk and incident analysis, data collection methods, management, project controls, architectural and construction history
Topics: Information Management, Human Resources, Site Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Procurement, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here