Overcoming barriers to adoption of smart stormwater technologies

Schmidt, J Q (2024) Overcoming barriers to adoption of smart stormwater technologies. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, USA.

Abstract

Digital technologies are changing the way cities around the world are managed, with sensors, algorithms, and robotics improving efficiency, lowering costs, and enabling new services to make urban life safer and more convenient. In water management, smart stormwater systems, in which algorithms leverage real-time sensor data to optimally control stormwater drainage infrastructure, are widely expected to revolutionize the industry. These advances are greatly needed as climate change and urbanization strain the capacity of existing infrastructure, resulting in increased rates of urban flooding and sewer overflows. In comparison to other sectors, however, adoption of digital technologies in stormwater management has been slow. A number of knowledge gaps underpin the barriers to adoption of smart stormwater technologies. We do not know how to build the robust data pipelines needed to support digital stormwater technologies, nor do we understand how to design digital technologies that are accepted and trusted by stormwater management practitioners. This dissertation addresses these fundamental knowledge gaps by examining how emerging smart stormwater technologies fit into — or are at odds with — existing water management workflows. The second chapter focuses on the role of data collection, presenting a quality assurance and control (QAQC) pipeline for large, low-cost wireless water sensor networks. This improves the reliability and scalability of real-time water sensor networks, which are essential to enable the algorithms that underlie smart water technologies. The third chapter addresses the challenge of creating actionable insights from continuous streams of sensor data. An automated data analysis pipeline is introduced for a novel green infrastructure sensor, which segments storm events and calculates the rate of water drawdown, a metric of how well the green infrastructure is performing. The fourth chapter examines the challenges of incorporating smart stormwater technologies into existing water control room workflows. A user study of water operators in Detroit, Michigan (USA) highlights constraints in the water management process that must be considered when designing new smart stormwater systems. The fifth chapter evaluates the accessibility of smart water technologies to all stormwater management practitioners. A web application is presented which allows users to model the city-wide stormwater impacts of green infrastructure in Detroit using the US EPA's Stormwater Management Model (EPA SWMM), a valuable but technically complex engineering tool which many green infrastructure practitioners have not traditionally been able to use. The discoveries made in this dissertation seek to support the development of the next-generation smart stormwater technologies that are better positioned to achieve widespread adoption in practice.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Kerkez, B
Uncontrolled Keywords: accessibility; climate change; drainage; pipeline; quality assurance; reliability; sensors; stormwater; urbanization
Index terms: robotics, dissertation, accessibility, efficiency, pipeline, urbanization, water management, green infrastructure, stream, practitioner, stormwater, drainage, workflow, digital technology, overflow, climate change, sensor data, sewer, data analysis, flooding, quality assurance
Subjects: performance management, management, water management, environmental engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, computing systems, sustainability and resilience, fluid mechanics, data analysis and analytics, inclusive design, automation and robotics, quality assurance, environmental hazards, research dissemination and communication, climate science, practitioner, environmental resource management, research products and data, urban planning
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here