Incorporating sustainability in infrastructure design: A case study of phoenix, Arizona

Tarr, K R (2024) Incorporating sustainability in infrastructure design: A case study of phoenix, Arizona. PhD thesis, Arizona State University, USA.

Abstract

Globally, cities face the threat of an uncertain, complex future. Climate change is poised to disrupt environmental and social systems in unpredictable ways. Simultaneously, the world is rapidly urbanizing. Climate and population changes alter the demand placed on infrastructure systems. With infrastructure systems facing new and unknowable pressures, researchers, policymakers, and designers have recognized the need for sustainable infrastructure systems that are able to adapt to changing conditions and limit the occurrence of catastrophic failures. This dissertation utilizes case studies within the Phoenix Metropolitan Area to identify opportunities for strengthening sustainable infrastructure design through policy (Chapter 2), performance (Chapter 3), and education (Chapter 4). The first study reviewed the City of Phoenix’s stormwater management standards to understand the presence of sustainable stormwater infrastructure designs within technical design guidelines. The results of this study indicated that Phoenix has not overcome common barriers to sustainable stormwater infrastructure implementation. Specifically, the City fails to appropriately integrate knowledge of sustainable stormwater infrastructure performance into its design manuals; many designers are skeptical of sustainable stormwater infrastructure designs because they lack knowledge of their performance, and policy has not appropriately addressed this concern. Indeed, sustainable stormwater management systems are understudied in arid and semi-arid climates like Phoenix. The second study quantified the flood control and water quality improvement capabilities of a small-scale (sustainable) bioretention basin system. The results from this study indicated that the system effectively performed in both areas, indicating promise for sustainable stormwater infrastructure designs in arid and semi-arid regions. However, performance alone may not be enough to incentivize designers to use sustainable stormwater infrastructure designs, especially if they do not receive education on them. The third study evaluated the presence of adaptability and sustainability characteristics within Arizona State University’s undergraduate civil engineering program and two comparison programs. Although adaptability and sustainability characteristics – indicative of sustainable designs – were present in all three programs, their absence from high-level organizations posed a challenge to embedding sustainability as a fundamental aspect of infrastructure design. Further developments in each of these areas will require collaboration across disciplines and a willingness to embrace innovation in the face of uncertainty.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Childers, D L
Uncontrolled Keywords: case studies; case study; civil engineering; climate change; collaboration; education; innovation; policy; population; social systems; standards; stormwater; sustainability; uncertainty
Index terms: presence, undergraduate, sustainable design, arid regions, stormwater, dissertation, face, implementation, population, social system, program, adaptability, case study, collaboration, designer, strengthening, climate change, sustainable stormwater management, water quality
Subjects: structural engineering, environmental science, demography, user focus, contractual arrangements, research dissemination and communication, physical geography and landforms, occupational health, curriculum development, psychology, management, social theory, sustainable design, data collection methods, design process, climate science, profession, software systems, environmental engineering
Topics: Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Procurement, Geographical Context, Education, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here