Review of construction safety research methods: Integrating theory and practice

Zou, P X; Sunindijo, R Y and Dainty, A (2011) Review of construction safety research methods: Integrating theory and practice. In: Egbu, C and Lou, E C W (eds.) Proceedings of 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2011, Bristol, UK.

Abstract

This paper reviewed the research methods used by the construction safety articles published in the five high-ranked international journals and the CIB W99 international conference proceedings in, 2009. In total, 561 papers were published by these journals and proceedings, in which 88 are related to construction safety. These 88 papers were classified according to the research methods adopted. It was found that nearly half the papers (43.2%) used quantitative methods while about a quarter (23.9%) applied qualitative methods and very few (9.1%) adopted mixed methods research while the rest used other forms of research methods. The shortcomings of the research methods currently adopted are discussed together with the possible reasons of minimum impact of these research outcomes on construction safety management practice. After describing the nature of construction safety practices which includes safety knowledge development and safety learning processes, a mixed methods research which integrates the realms of theory and practice is proposed for conducting construction safety research. It is suggested that researchers should find opportunities to collaborate with practitioners in conducting construction safety research to ensure the relevancy and application of research findings such that to improve both safety management practices and theory development.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety; mixed methods; qualitative; quantitative; research methods
Index terms: mixed method, qualitative method, journal, conference, practitioner, quantitative method, management practice, safety management, construction safety
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, research design and methodology, practitioner, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, management
Topics: Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here