Ahiaga-Dagbui, D and Smith, S D (2012) Neural networks for modelling the final target cost of water projects. In: Smith, S D (ed.) Proceedings of 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
Producing reasonably accurate cost estimates at the planning stage of a project important for the subsequent success of the project. The estimator has to be able to make judgement on the cost influence of a number of factors including site conditions, procurement, risks, price changes, likely scope changes or type of contract. This can shroud the estimation process in uncertainty, which has often resulted in project cost overruns. The knowledge acquisition, generalization and forecasting capabilities of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are explored in this pilot study to build final cost estimation models that incorporate the cost effect of some of the factors mentioned above. Data was collected on ninety-eight water-related construction projects completed in Scotland between 2007-2011. Separate cost models were developed for normalized target cost and log of target costs. Variable transformation and weight decay regularization were then explored to improve the final model’s performance. As a prototype of a wider research, the final model’s performance was very satisfactory, demonstrating ANN ability to capture the interactions between the predictor variables and final cost. Ten input variables, all readily available or measurable at the planning stages for the project, were used within a Multilayer Perceptron Architecture and a Quasi-Newton training algorithm.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost estimation; cost modelling; neural networks |
| Index terms: | construction project, artificial neural network, forecasting, estimator, prototype, neural network, transformation, target cost, estimation, cost estimating, modelling, multilayer, interaction, cost model, knowledge acquisition, overrun, project cost, scope change, cost estimate, Scotland |
| Subjects: | business, scope management, profession, project controls, Geography, student development, specialized materials and systems, economics, prediction and forecasting, analytical methods, modelling and simulation, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, behavioral psychology, production management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Cost Management, Education, Geographical Context, Time Control, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here