Yang, C P (2006) Factors affecting the performance of public projects in Taiwan. Journal of Construction Research, 7(1), pp. 207-225. ISSN 1609-9451
Abstract
There are many factors affecting the performance of public projects which are reviewed by the responsible entities (Government engineering agency) and controlled by the contractors. However, responsible entities and contractors have different viewpoints to identify the primary influential factors of a project because of differences in their roles and responsibility. Sometimes these differences cause a prime source for a project's defect, schedule delay, and even lawsuit. In order to perform a project successfully, the differences in the viewpoint of these two entities must first be understood clearly. To this end, this study synthesizes possible 91 influential factors of transportation projects from Taiwan official reports. Followed by the multi-criteria evaluation procedure and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, the primary influential factors are screened out and ranked with the priority orders. Surprisingly, there are forty co-primary factors selected by both the responsible entities and the contractors. However, it is found that the priority orders for the factors ranked by the responsible entities are somewhat different from those ranked by the contractors. The reasons why the rank orders are different between responsible entities and contractors are discussed. This is a comprehensively done research project and will be very useful for the personnel involved in oversea construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | performance; public project; Taiwan |
| Index terms: | transportation project, Taiwan, personnel, agency, influential factor, public project, criteria evaluation, construction project, schedule delay, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process |
| Subjects: | decision-making and optimization, infrastructure engineering, Geography, production management, sociology, decision analysis, project controls, infrastructure and transport systems, management, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Time Control, Human Resources, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here