Management of value and uncertainty in construction projects

Masurier, J L; Blockley, D and Wood, D M (2000) Management of value and uncertainty in construction projects. Journal of Construction Research, 1(2), pp. 123-129. ISSN 1609-9451

Abstract

Uncertainties present opportunities as well as risks. By managing uncertainties projects can achieve better value, for example through avoidance of problems that reduce value; or through identification of efficiencies that lead to increased value. Traditional approaches to risk management seek to identify and eliminate risks early in the project. However, attempts to eliminate risks can have adverse consequences. For example designing for the worst case can lead to complacency since it will be assumed that every eventuality is covered. Conditions may transpire which were completely unexpected, and with no strategy for detecting and dealing with them, can lead to a hasty redesign or sometimes a project crisis. An alternative approach is to identify the uncertainties then monitor and manage them throughout the project life cycle. An approach used in geotechnical design provides a model for managing uncertainty. The observational method involves an initial assessment of the uncertain conditions followed by designs based on a prediction of the most likely manifestations of these conditions. Alternative designs or contingency plans are prepared to cover the worst conceivable conditions. When combined with value management the observational method can provide an integrated system for managing various project uncertainties.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: geotechnics; observational method; risk; uncertainty; value
Index terms: project uncertainty, observation, strategy, construction project, efficiency, life cycle, geotechnics, risk management, value management, redesign, integrated system
Subjects: performance management, management, project management theory and practice, geotechnical engineering, data collection methods, risk assessment, value management, design methods, production management
Topics: Quality Management, Value Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Design Practice, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here