Increasing Singapore's construction productivity through construction process re-engineering

Chew, A T W and Ling, F Y Y (2002) Increasing Singapore's construction productivity through construction process re-engineering. Journal of Construction Research, 3(1), pp. 123-45. ISSN 1609-9451

Abstract

Using Construction Process Re-engineering (CPR), seventeen initiatives that may bring about improved performance are identified. To ascertain these initiatives' degree of usage and suitability to raise productivity, the views of construction industry practitioners, namely contractors, architects and clients, were sought through a postal survey. The results showed that 14 of these methods are suitable to raise productivity. However, only four are frequently used. These are: "the use of specialist sub-contractors"; "use of alternative dispute resolution techniques"; "selection of contractors on the basis of past performance"; and "practising knowledge management for systematic continuous improvement". There is therefore much potential in raising productivity by using more of the available re-engineering initiatives. With a few exceptions, the ratings were consistent across different types of respondents. Numerous barriers to implementing the initiatives are also identified. It is recommended that for the construction industry to achieve higher productivity, more CPR initiatives should be adopted. In particular, the industry should focus on obtaining inputs from all participants at the design stage, training professionals to be multi-skilled, and undertaking joint risk analysis for early risk allocation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: lean construction; construction process re-engineering; Singapore; productivity improvement
Index terms: Singapore, continuous improvement, productivity, specialist sub-contractor, architect, risk allocation, construction productivity, construction industry, lean construction, survey, construction process, design stage, practitioner, suitability, alternative dispute resolution, risk analysis, knowledge management
Subjects: design criteria, industry analysis, professional development, performance measurement, management, profession, data collection methods, environmental hazards, building construction, Geography, financial risk, contract management, professional practice, operations management, practitioner
Topics: Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Contract Administration, Site Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here