Love, P E D; Tse, R Y C; Holt, G D and Proverbs, D G (2002) Transaction costs, learning, and alliances. Journal of Construction Research, 3(2), pp. 193-207. ISSN 1609-9451
Abstract
Alliances in construction, whether in the form of partnering arrangements or strategic commercial relationships, provide a mechanism that can improve inter-organizational relations and project performance. Alliances help construction organizations to achieve their business objectives through collaborative, harmonious commercial relationships. The key to gaining competitive advantage and improving customer satisfaction lies in the ability of construction organizations to form such cooperative "learning" alliances. Essentially, these long should be long term strategic partnerships, which engender an environment to enable mutual and reflective learning (between organizations). It is proffered that cooperative learning alliances enable construction organizations to better consider business decisions that are influenced by this learning climate (bounded rationality), and make best use of the information (opportunism) they encounter. These two concepts impact considerably on transaction costs within organizations. Thus, if construction organizations utilize a mechanism to best capitalize on these facets, then more efficient internal governance structures result. This can be achieved, through cooperative learning where ideas, objectives and mission are shared between alliance partners. To demonstrate the effectiveness of cooperative learning alliances, a case study is used to explore their impact on transaction costs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | learning alliance; transaction costs; bounded rationality; opportunism |
| Index terms: | bounded rationality, cooperative learning, customer satisfaction, effectiveness, project performance, case study, governance, construction organization, partnering, competitive advantage, partnership, opportunism, transaction cost |
| Subjects: | financial analysis, market analysis, decision-making and reasoning, organization, partnership management, service delivery, project management theory and practice, performance management, learning methods, data collection methods, business |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Governance, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Project Management, Education, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here