Development of professional system in the construction industry of China

Chan, E H W and Chan, A T S (2002) Development of professional system in the construction industry of China. Journal of Construction Research, 3(2), pp. 271-284. ISSN 1609-9451

Abstract

Nowadays, the traditional roles and specialisms of the different disciplines of professionals such as architects, engineers and surveyors in construction industry are becoming less clear-cut. The concept of educating separate disciplines of construction professional may not be apt any more in the so-called "international" practice system. With the unique socio-economic legacy in China, professional practice and qualifying system in the construction industry is rather different in comparison with the international context. This uniqueness creates an ideal opportunity for China to look for its own new model of training and development of construction professional instead of merely copying the "international" mode. Based on a survey carried out in Hong Kong, this paper aims to investigate the phenomenon of disintegrating professional boundaries in the "international" practice system which serves as a reflection on the development of construction professionals in China. The investigation shows that construction professionals should critically re-examine their professional skills in their traditional domains. Multi-disciplinary and integrative-professional approach in the curricula of education is called for in the "international" practice. The traditional education curriculum may not be sustainable in today's "international" construction industry. At this juncture, China can make use of the opportunity to establish a new model for itself.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction professionals; education; professionalism; training; China
Index terms: investigation, architect, reflection, construction professional, construction industry, becoming, Hong Kong, engineer, boundaries, professional practice, professionalism, China, survey
Subjects: profession, data collection methods, industry analysis, professional development, property law, philosophical process, Geography
Topics: Geographical Context, Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here