Oo, B L; Ling, F Y Y and Soo, A (2015) Construction procurement: Modelling bidders' learning in recurrent bidding. Construction Economics and Building, 15(4), pp. 16-29. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Construction remains a significant area of public expenditure. An understanding of the process of changes in construction pricing, and how the process can be manipulated through the release of bidding feedback information is vital, in order to best design clients' procurement policies. This paper aims to statistically model inexperienced individual bidders' learning in recurrent bidding under partial and full information feedback conditions. Using an experimental dataset, the developed linear mixed model contains three predictor variables, namely: time factor, information feedback conditions, and bidding success rate in the preceding round. The results show nonlinearity and curvature in the bidders' learning curves. They are generally less competitive in time periods after a winning bid with lower average bids submitted by those subjected to full information feedback condition. In addition, the model has captured the existence of heterogeneity across bidders with individual-specific parameter estimates that demonstrate the uniqueness of individual bidders' learning curves in recurrent bidding. The findings advocate for adequate bidding feedback information in clients' procurement design to facilitate learning among contractors, which may in turn lead to increased competitiveness in their bids.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction procurement; bidding; information feedback; learning. |
| Index terms: | estimate, dataset, bidding, modelling, public expenditure, pricing, construction procurement, procurement policy, competitiveness, bidder |
| Subjects: | data management, analytical methods, political science, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, market analysis, public policy, financial and cost management, bidding |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Cost Management, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here