Devapriya, K A K and Pretorius, F (2002) The economic implication of project finance arrangements for BOO/BOT power projects in Asia. Journal of Construction Research, 3(2), pp. 285-309. ISSN 1609-9451
Abstract
Financial constraints over the traditional sources of funds, coupled with increasing demand for infrastructure have forced the governments of developing countries to seek Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI) development. As such Project Finance (PF) modalities such as BOO/BOT and its variants are found to be the most commonly adopted ones for Private Projects (PPs). However, a critical look into the economic impact of alternative financing mechanisms for infrastructure is still required, although much has been written on the evaluation of PPI. This paper examines broader economic implications originated from five basic channels associated with PF transactions in private PPs. To achieve this objective, an analytical framework with theoretical foundation is developed to review empirical evidence of BOO/BOT type PPs. While economic cost factors reflect characteristics of PF and have bearing on the direct parties to the transaction, economic benefits of PF for PPs seem largely attributable to the host country. Findings further reveal that domestic financing, institutional support and proper balancing of the implications of PF mechanisms could mitigate the negative impact on the price of private power on many consumers. Limitations in achieving sustainable private power generation are largely attributable to the absence of more effective reforms to facilitate PF transactions in host countries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BOO/BOT power projects; developing countries; economic implication; project finance; Asia |
| Index terms: | cost factor, power generation, developing country, Asia, economic impact, evidence, analytical framework, financing, project finance |
| Subjects: | financial management, economics, data analysis and analytics, energy systems, regions and continents, development economics, financial analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, International Construction, Geographical Context, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here