Paulson, B C (2003) Design and construction for the rest of us. Journal of Construction Research, 4(2), pp. 115-127. ISSN 1609-9451
Abstract
Civil engineering academics are caught between a science-based university culture on one side, and on the other, the expectations of students and practicing engineers in industry who want practical knowledge for immediate application. The science-based culture primarily measures faculty by research projects and funding, Ph.D. students produced, and by papers refereed primarily by academic peers for publication and citation in scholarly journals. There are strong pressures to produce these outputs, which are duly quantified for tenure and promotion decisions but the system does not directly reward time spent gaining practical experience in full-time or part time jobs prior to academic employment, or later in summers or sabbaticals, or in solving problems through consultations. This paper will address the balance between academia and practice, and focus on the residential building sector of the design and construction industry as one that is largely neglected by engineering programs. In particular, it will show where the design and construction of residential structures can provide opportunities to enhance engineering education and open new avenues for broad, interdisciplinary research that are different from those where engineering academics normally venture. In conclusion, it will focus on academics who successfully bridge the realm of academia and the world around them.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction education; design; construction research |
| Index terms: | funding, publication, engineering education, academia, engineer, journal, program, interdisciplinary research, design and construction, part time, promotion, residential building, tenure, construction education, summer, employment, science |
| Subjects: | profession, professional education, management, economic analysis, construction type, research dissemination and communication, specialized education, research methods, educational institutions, real estate economics, climate science, software systems, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Education, Procurement, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Information Management, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here