Deacon, C and Smallwood, J (2003) Health promotion in South African construction. Journal of Construction Research, 4(2), pp. 129-140. ISSN 1609-9451
Abstract
The maintenance of health in industrial communities presents special problems and priorities, which are exacerbated in developing countries by socio-economic realities. Lifestyle, communicable diseases, alcohol and drug abuse are issues, which extend far beyond the boundaries of society, impacting on individuals' performance in the workplace. The aim of health promotion is to persuade people to adopt and maintain healthy life practices, thus preventing ill-health and promoting health and overall performance. Given the aforementioned, a descriptive survey was conducted among general contractors (GCs) to determine: the extent of health promotion; the extent to which employees would benefit there from, and the perceived holistic benefits. The findings indicate that little or no health promotion is undertaken in South African construction. However, GCs perceive that health promotion would benefit employees, the benefits including improved health and project performance manifested in, inter alia, lower absenteeism, and improved productivity and quality.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | health promotion; benefits |
| Index terms: | productivity, lifestyle, project performance, developing country, absenteeism, society, general contractor, survey, boundaries, alcohol, health promotion |
| Subjects: | development economics, communities and social development, demography, practitioner, property law, psychology, project management theory and practice, management, public and environmental health, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, International Construction, Human Resources, Health and Safety, Project Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here