Edwards, D J (2003) Accident trends involving construction plant: an exploratory analysis. Journal of Construction Research, 4(2), pp. 161-173. ISSN 1609-9451
Abstract
An investigation into accident trends involving plant operating within the UK construction industry over the previous decade (1989 to 1999) is presented. The work commences with a description of plant and equipment purchased within the UK construction sector, with specific reference to the size of the market and the types of plant item purchased. Pertinent European plant legislation is briefly reviewed before an analysis of health and safety statistics is undertaken (obtained from the Health and Safety Executive and the Department of Environment, Trade and the Regions). Accident rates involving plant are analyzed not only across the total workforce but also for construction "employees" and "subcontractors" separately. Principal findings reveal that the plant related accident rate for employees is four times that for subcontractors. Moreover, despite recent legislation (such as the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) and the Safe Use of Lifting Equipment (LOLER)), plant related accident rates across the construction workforce remain largely unchanged. Hypothesized reasons for this finding are attributed mainly to a lack of satisfactory practitioner understanding of plant legislation, combined with a failure by the industry to impose mandatory plant operator training certification. Guidance is also provided to practitioners on new UK government proposals that aim to hold companies and individuals "criminally" responsible for health and safety breaches.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction plant; health and safety; accident rates; legislation |
| Index terms: | health and safety executive, construction plant, plant and equipment, statistics, construction industry, investigation, certification, health and safety, legislation, proposal, subcontractor, construction sector, practitioner, lifting, regulation |
| Subjects: | construction equipment, administrative processes, industry analysis, political science, occupational health and safety management, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, health safety and environment, manufacturing engineering, practitioner, project planning, legal systems |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Roles and Professions, Plant and Equipment, Governance, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here