Tan, W (2003) The development of construction education in Singapore. Journal of Construction Research, 4(2), pp. 207-222. ISSN 1609-9451
Abstract
In an earlier study, learning by doing (LBD) was found to be insignificant in the Singapore construction industry. This paper examines the development of the formal education system to uncover some of the reasons why so little learning by doing occurs in the construction industry. Under the colonial authorities, construction education was neglected. But after political independence, it developed slowly despite a massive public housing program. Much of the labor supply comes from low-wage unskilled and semi-skilled foreign workers. In the case of local construction workers, skills training takes place within the context of a deliberate general education policy of streaming to reduce the high attrition rate that resulted from the colonial and post-colonial bilingual policy. Screening channels the bulk of weaker students towards the construction sector. At the tertiary level, the rapid expansion of polytechnic education to support high economic growth raises the issue of education quality and limited opportunities for upgrading. The result is a distinctive fourtier system of production based on foreign workers, local semi-skilled workers, technicians and professionals. The stark subclass consciousness is likely to impede learning.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction education policy; learning by doing; productivity |
| Index terms: | upgrading, tertiary, construction sector, program, construction education, labour supply, productivity, skilled worker, screening, polytechnic, Singapore, economic growth, education policy, construction worker, construction industry, consciousness, public housing, foreign worker |
| Subjects: | curriculum development, human factors and perception, practitioner, construction type, strategic management, professional education, labour economics, Geography, economic development, business, industry analysis, educational institutions, software systems, management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Geographical Context, Education, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Human Resources, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here