A proposed quantitative model for building repair and maintenance: Theory, model development and application

Alani, A M; Petersen, A K; Chapman, K G and Khosrowshahi, F (2004) A proposed quantitative model for building repair and maintenance: Theory, model development and application. Journal of Construction Research, 5(2), pp. 193-210. ISSN 1609-9451

Abstract

The effective and efficient management of buildings necessitates, amongst other aspects, the ability to interrogate reliable data relating to condition, cost implications of that condition and the spend options available and appropriate. Most buildings have been subject to one or more surveys and data from these is often available to the building owner, manager or user. The form and value of such data is, however, variable in the extreme and is, not least, relevant mainly to the organization or person who commissioned that particular survey. This paper introduces a quantitative model for the repair and maintenance of buildings/properties. It is based on a coded system of observing, assessing, recording and appraising the condition of those elements of a building which would most influence the costs of repairing or maintaining elements of, or the whole of, buildings. Background information and criteria for the development of this model is detailed in this paper and also, the model matrix system defining the step-by-step calculation process of cost of repair and maintenance has been reported. A detailed report on a case-study (application of the model) consisting of the data collection and cost analysis of a property is also provided. The case-study includes a comparison between the predicted cost of repair and the real cost of repair (cost after completion of repair work) concerning a residential dwelling.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: quantitative; model; repair; maintenance; building
Index terms: survey, repair, option, manager, model development, owner, cost analysis
Subjects: analytical methods, financial and cost management, maintenance engineering, data collection methods, practitioner, decision analysis, sociology
Topics: Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here