Ling, F Y Y (2005) Global factors affecting margin-size of construction projects. Journal of Construction Research, 6(1), pp. 91-106. ISSN 1609-9451
Abstract
Identifying the optimum margin-size for a project is very important in order for contractors to win a tender. The aim of this study is to investigate the "global" factors that must be considered by contractors when deciding on the margin-size, irrespective of which country the project is located. The research design is based on a meta-analysis of six disparate works undertaken in Australia, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the UK and the USA. Cross-country comparisons are made, so as to identify factors that are considered by the majority of the contractors. One factor that affects margin-size in all the countries being investigated is the "need for work". Other "global" factors are: the risk involved owing to the nature of the work; current workload; reliability of company pricing; and competitiveness of other bids. It is recommended that contractors who are entering new geographical locations consider these factors when deciding on the margin-size of their bids. There are also factors considered in margin-size estimation that are country specific. In addition, contractors in some countries do not consider certain factors that are deemed important by their counterparts in other countries. Non-indigenous contractors who want to bid for projects in foreign countries are urged to use the findings of this study to find out the factors they need to consider when deciding on the margin-size.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | margin-size; mark-up; tendering; cost estimating; international construction |
| Index terms: | Singapore, pricing, Saudi Arabia, research design, Australia, estimation, Canada, competitiveness, international construction, mark-up, meta-analysis, cost estimating, workload, construction project |
| Subjects: | strategic management, economic analysis, Geography, production management, market analysis, research design and methodology, financial and cost management, management, research evaluation and metrics, price determination |
| Topics: | Human Resources, International Construction, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here