Malekzadeh, H; Edwards, D J and Harris, F C (2005) Simulating the ground freezing process: a decision support model. Journal of Construction Research, 6(1), pp. 107-121. ISSN 1609-9451
Abstract
This paper describes the development of a decision support computer model to aid ground freezing on construction and civil engineering projects. The methodology examined three pragmatic considerations of the ground freezing process. These are: (i) risk analysis (to determine data and information required to utilize risk models); (ii) finite element analysis for ground freezing (to obtain appropriate freeze pipe sizes and determine distances between pipes for reducing the duration of the freezing process); and (iii) linear programming (to derive optimum cost with respect to excavation length and ice-wall thickness). These pragmatic considerations were then applied to field studies in order to test model validity. In combination, the decision support model developed demonstrated novelty specifically for cost estimating and planning ground freezing works. Greater "practitioner" understanding and consequently, wider utilization of the models presented could therefore translate as cost optimization of the ground freezing process. The paper concludes with directions for future research work that aims to: (i) apply the algorithms employed to other temporary works methodologies; (ii) optimize the cost specification of ground freezing using linear programming applied to "live" financial data; and (iii) transpose the research into a user-friendly software package.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction/civil projects; ground freezing; financial models; finite element analysis; linear programming |
| Index terms: | risk analysis, methodology, practitioner, excavation, software package, cost optimization, field study, thickness, decision support, specification, cost estimating, duration, finite element analysis, temporary work, freezing, linear programming, validity |
| Subjects: | algorithms, research methods, environmental hazards, engineering analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, materials science, operations management, environmental science, construction operations, economics, software systems, contractual condition, decision analysis, project controls, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability, Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Time Control, Contract Administration, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here