Asad, S and Dainty, A R J (2005) Job motivational factors for disparate occupational groups within the UK construction sector: A comparative analysis. Journal of Construction Research, 6(2), pp. 223-236. ISSN 1609-9451
Abstract
Despite the popularity of motivation research in the latter half of the twentieth century, little empirical evidence exists of the factors influencing the motivation of different occupational groups within the construction industry. Furthermore, no significant attempt has been made to compare the job motivation level difference of the employees working in large companies or small-medium sized enterprises (SMEs). This research attempts to fill these knowledge gaps by exploring the motivation of members of three occupational groups (professional engineers, skilled trade-craft workers and unskilled or semi-skilled general operatives), working for a variety of SMEs and large sized businesses. The findings reveal that professional employees are predominantly motivated by intrinsic reward, which contrasts markedly with unskilled workers who demonstrate a desire for extrinsic rewards. However, company size does not appear to affect the motivation of any of the groups studied significantly.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | motivation; quantitative analysis; construction employees; UK |
| Index terms: | construction industry, operative, engineer, construction employee, evidence, quantitative analysis, construction sector, comparative analysis, motivation |
| Subjects: | psychology, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, data analysis and analytics, profession, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here