Suraji, A; Sulaiman, K; Mahyuddin, N and Mohamed, O (2006) Rethinking construction safety: An introduction to total safety management. Journal of Construction Research, 7(1), pp. 49-63. ISSN 1609-9451
Abstract
Who is responsible for construction safety: architects, engineers, contractors, or perhaps even clients? Safety of the constructed facility is normally the responsibility of the architect and engineer, whereas safety of the construction process is conventionally considered to be the contractor's responsibility. In many cases, construction accidents are, therefore, mainly considered as the contractor's responsibility. In fact, many factors associated with construction accidents can be traced back to the designer's responsibility as well as the client's responsibility. Under the barner of rethinking construction mainly introduced in the UK Construction industry, there is a need to include rethinking construction safety as a focus. This paper discuss a concept of rethinking construction safety. This concept contains an introduction of total safety management (TSM) in construction. The development of this concept is based on the constraint-response theory of construction accident. In this paper, the role of project participants in managing construction safety are examined. A framework of the total safety management is introduced. It summarises how all project participants involved in the project implementation process, from project concept, project design, and throughout project construction work together to control any risk of construction accident. The clients, designers, contractors and other participants share the responsibility of construction safety. Further development and implementation of this concept will help in improving safety performance in construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | rethinking construction safety; the constraint-response theory; total safety management |
| Index terms: | engineer, designer, project design, construction industry, implementation, architect, construction work, construction safety, safety management, safety performance, construction process, construction accident |
| Subjects: | profession, industry analysis, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, contractual arrangements, operations management, building construction |
| Topics: | Project Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Procurement, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here