An automated BIM and system dynamics tool for assessing safety leading indicators in construction projects

Dadashi Haji, M and Behnam, B (2025) An automated BIM and system dynamics tool for assessing safety leading indicators in construction projects. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 43(3), pp. 414-439. ISSN 2398-4708

Abstract

Purpose: It is a well-accepted note that to enhance safety performance in a project by preventing hazards, recognizing the safety leading indicators is of paramount importance. Design/methodology/approach: In this research, the relationship between safety leading indicators is determined, and their impacts on the project are assessed and visualized throughout the time of the project in a proactive manner. Construction and safety experts are first interviewed to determine the most important safety leading indicators of the construction industry, and then the relationships that may exist between them are identified. Furthermore, a system dynamics model is generated using the interviews and integrated with an add-on developed on the building information modeling (BIM) platform. Finally, the impacts of the safety leading indicators on the project are calculated based on their time of occurrence, impact time and effective radius. Findings: The add-on generates a heat-map that visualizes the impacts of the safety leading indicators on the project through time. Moreover, to assess the effectiveness of the developed tool, a case study is conducted on a station located on a water transfer line. In order to validate the results of the tool, a survey is also conducted from the project's staff and experts in the field. Previous studies have so far focused on active safety leading indicators that may result in a particular hazard, and the importance of the effects that safety leading indicators have on another is not considered. This study considers their effects on each other in a real-time manner. Originality/value: Using this tool project's stakeholders and staff can identify the hazards proactively; hence, they can make the required decisions in advance to reduce the impact of associated events. Moreover, two other potentially contributions of the presented work can be enumerated as: firstly, the findings provide a knowledge framework of active safety leading indicators and their interactions for construction safety researchers who can go on to further study safety management. Secondly, the proposed framework contributes to encouragement of time-based location-based preventive strategies on construction sites.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modeling; construction projects; safety leading indicators; safety management system; system dynamics
Index terms: encouragement, building information modelling, case study, platform, construction industry, interaction, safety management system, effectiveness, construction site, strategy, survey, interview, safety management, construction safety, safety performance, methodology, construction project, system dynamics
Subjects: work location, data collection methods, computing systems, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, information systems, industry analysis, performance management, management, behavioral psychology, research methods, digital design, production management, health safety and environment
Topics: Digital Applications, Human Resources, Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Project Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here