Investigating personal protective equipment awareness of artisans in the informal sector: Issues and measures to improve achieving SDG 3

Ebekozien, A; Aigbavboa, C; Ahmed, M A H; Thwala, W D; Samsurijan, M S; Aliu, J; Adekunle, S A; Akinradewo, O and Adoye, J (2025) Investigating personal protective equipment awareness of artisans in the informal sector: Issues and measures to improve achieving SDG 3. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 43(8), pp. 59-74. ISSN 2398-4708

Abstract

Purpose: The informal sector construction artisans are critical to the economic growth of a nation. The frequent incidence of hazards, especially where informal sector construction artisans are engaged, may threaten achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3. Records show that anti-safety issues (absence of personal protective equipment [PPE]) threaten the lives and well-being of artisans and may be rampant in informal construction sites. Thus, this study aims to investigate the level of the informal sector’s artisans’ PPE awareness and offer suggestions to improve it and, by extension, improve achieving Goal 3. Design/methodology/approach: The researchers collected the study’s data through face-to-face interviews from selected building sites with the approval of the clients and/or representatives in Benin City and Lagos, Nigeria. In total, 40 artisans were engaged across major construction trades, and the study achieved saturation. The researchers manually analysed the collected data and presented them using the thematic method. Findings: Results show lax compliance with basic safety awareness and PPE, ignorance of the consequences to their health, the client’s attitude not to incur extra cost for safety kits, weak educational background, lax supervision of construction sites, lax safety compliance by authorised agencies and absence of informal sector artisans’ engagement regulation emerged as the root cause for the low compliance. Originality/value: As part of the study’s implications, it recommends that the relevant government ministries, departments and/or agencies improve and extend their safety monitoring to informal construction sites to improve achieving SDG 3. This study may stir policymakers to persuade the Nigerian President to sign the Labour, Safety, Health and Welfare Bill 2012 (updated in 2016) into law and, by extension, improve achieving Goal 3.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction site; informal artisans; Nigeria; personal protective equipment; safety; sustainable development goal 3
Index terms: well-being, methodology, regulation, agency, informal sector, approval, interview, compliance, construction site, building site, safety issue, face, monitoring, Lagos, personal protective equipment, sustainable development goal, economic growth, Benin, supervision, informal construction, Nigeria
Subjects: psychology, construction operations, contractual role, economic development, research methods, sustainable design, health safety and environment, Geography, financial risk, work location, data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing, control systems, occupational health and safety management, sociology, industry analysis, political science, site and location studies
Topics: Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management, Sustainability, Human Resources, Contract Administration, Site Management, Organizational Design, Cost Management, Research Practice, Governance
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here