Nidhin, B K S N; Domingo, N; Bui, T T P and Wilkinson, S (2025) Construction stakeholders' knowledge on zero carbon initiatives in New Zealand. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 43(3), pp. 512-527. ISSN 2398-4708
Abstract
Purpose: In light of climate change, the design and construction of buildings needs to shift from conventional to lower-carbon practices to maximise carbon reduction. Over the past few years, the zero carbon buildings (ZCBs) approach has been promoted worldwide as an effective way to reduce environmental impacts and mitigate climate change. Although zero-carbon policies, technologies, processes and products are widely available in the construction market, construction stakeholders play an important part in adopting relevant strategies to implement ZCBs successfully. This study investigates the knowledge of construction stakeholders involved in the design and construction of buildings regarding zero carbon initiatives in New Zealand. Design/methodology/approach: The research was conducted using a literature review and an online questionnaire survey with various New Zealand's construction stakeholders. Findings: The findings indicate a low level of knowledge regarding the design and construction of ZCBs. To successfully deliver ZCBs, the study suggests that construction stakeholders must have their self-awareness increased, especially in improving knowledge of whole-of-life embodied carbon reduction. The governments and construction sectors should devote more effort to establishing training programmes and knowledge-sharing platforms to improve stakeholder knowledge in carbon literacy, building assessment methods, energy modelling and life cycle assessment. Originality/value: The research implications may assist the real-world uptake of the ZCBs approach by offering academics and practitioners an insight into the ZCBs knowledge gaps.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building; carbon emissions; carbon reduction; climate change; knowledge management; zero carbon |
| Index terms: | energy modelling, embodied carbon, building assessment, zero carbon building, strategy, life cycle assessment, literature review, programme, survey, methodology, questionnaire, environmental impact, practitioner, construction sector, knowledge management, climate change, low level, carbon emission, carbon reduction, platform, New Zealand, design and construction, construction market |
| Subjects: | practitioner, climate science, environmental impact, contractual arrangements, digital design, Geography, research methods, asset management, market analysis, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, sustainability and energy, professional development, management, industry analysis, measurement and scaling, project controls |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Time Control, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Procurement, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here