Evaluation of risk factors affecting the safety of coal mine construction projects using an integrated DEMATEL-ISM approach

Shi, X; Liu, Y; Ma, K; Gu, Z; Qiao, Y; Ni, G; Ojum, C; Opoku, A and Liu, Y (2025) Evaluation of risk factors affecting the safety of coal mine construction projects using an integrated DEMATEL-ISM approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(5), pp. 3432-3452. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is to identify and evaluate the safety risk factors in the coal mine construction process. Design/methodology/approach: The text mining technique was applied in the stage of safety risk factor identification. The association rules method was used to obtain associations with safety risk factors. Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM) were utilized to evaluate safety risk factors. Findings: The results show that 18 safety risk factors are divided into 6 levels. There are 12 risk transmission paths in total. Meanwhile, unsafe behavior and equipment malfunction failure are the direct causes of accidents, and inadequate management system is the basic factor that determines the safety risk status. Research limitations/implications: Due to the limitation of the computational matrix workload, this article only categorizes numerous lexical items into 18 factors. Then, the workshop relied on a limited number of experts; thus, the findings may be potentially biased. Next, the accident report lacks a universal standard for compilation, and the use of text mining technique may be further optimized. Finally, since the data are all from China, subsequent cross-country studies should be considered. Social implications: The results can help China coal mine project managers to have a clear understanding of safety risks, efficiently carry out risk hazard identification work and take timely measures to cut off the path of transmission with risks identified in this study. This helps reduce the economic losses of coal mining enterprises, thus improving the safety standards of the entire coal mining industry and the national standards for coal mine safety policy formulation. Originality/value: Coal mine construction projects are characterized by complexity and difficulties in construction. Current research on the identification and assessment of safety risk factors in coal mine construction is insufficient. This study combines objective and systematic research approaches. The findings contribute to the safety risk management of China coal mine construction projects by providing a basis for the development of safety measures.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: association rules; coal mine construction; integrated DEMATEL-ISM approach; risk factors; safety accidents; text mining
Index terms: project manager, safety measures, workshop, hazard identification, mining, structural modelling, risk factor, risk management, laboratory, unsafe behaviour, management system, workload, methodology, decision-making, construction process, construction project, China, safety standards, complexity
Subjects: research methods, health safety and environment, Geography, production management, financial risk, research management, building construction, environmental hazards, construction type, analytical methods, management, occupational health and safety management, geotechnical engineering, decision analysis, systems engineering, profession, risk assessment
Topics: Sustainability, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Site Management, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here