Van Tam, N (2025) Impact of self-efficacy on construction labor productivity: The mediating role of work motivation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(5), pp. 3407-3431. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Though widely recognized as essential for improving work performance across various domains, self-efficacy’s specific role in managing construction workforces remains understudied. This knowledge gap restricts our ability to uncover new factors that enhance workforce management effectiveness and ultimately boost construction labor productivity (CLP). To address this, our study proposes and tests a novel model. This model explores the impact mechanism of self-efficacy on CLP by investigating the mediating role of work motivation. By delving into this crucial yet underexplored area, we aim to provide valuable insights for construction project managers and researchers alike, paving the way for more effective workforce management strategies and consequently, improved CLP. Design/methodology/approach: This study utilizes a mixed-method approach, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Data from 112 rebar workers at five construction sites in Vietnam underwent analysis using Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the novel research model. Findings: The results indicate a positive and significant association between self-efficacy and CLP. Additionally, work motivation emerged as a full mediator in the relationship between self-efficacy and CLP. Specifically, individuals with higher self-efficacy set ambitious goals and invest more effort in their pursuit, leading to increased work motivation and, ultimately, heightened productivity levels. Practical implications: The significant implications of the current study extend to construction managers and policymakers alike. Construction managers can leverage the findings to devise targeted interventions aimed at enhancing the self-efficacy and work motivation of their workforce, potentially resulting in noteworthy enhancements in CLP. Policymakers, too, can benefit from these findings by formulating policies that actively support the cultivation of self-efficacy and work motivation among construction workers. Such policies have the potential to foster a more productive and efficient construction industry, aligning with the broader goals of workforce development and industry enhancement. Originality/value: This study expands existing knowledge by identifying the important role of self-efficacy in work performance enhancement and the mediating role of work motivation in terms of these relationships.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; labor productivity; self-efficacy; work motivation |
| Index terms: | construction project, methodology, workforce development, construction manager, exploratory factor analysis, manager, Vietnam, management effectiveness, paving, construction site, structural equation modelling, confirmatory factor analysis, motivation, construction labour, rebar, labour productivity, construction worker, construction industry, self-efficacy, work performance, mediator, management strategy, productivity |
| Subjects: | transportation engineering, Geography, production management, research methods, operations management, psychology, practitioner, human factors and perception, statistical analysis, industry analysis, professional development, performance measurement, management, work location, building materials, dispute resolution, profession |
| Topics: | Education, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here