Baden-Hellard, R (1996) The partnering philosophy: A procurement strategy for satisfaction through a teamwork solution to project quality. Journal of Construction Procurement, 2(1), pp. 41-55. ISSN 1358-9180
Abstract
Quality management techniques and partnering in particular involve philosophies that require changes in culture which come from previous mind-sets and procurement strategies. The evolution of cultural change is addressed through total quality management into the partnering ambience which, it is argued, is a more cost-effective and satisfactory way of procuring construction projects. It identifies the client and who the other project stakeholders are, when and how the partnering process should begin and provides the details of the process at all stages from before the tenders are called for to the projects conclusion. It looks at the benefits that will result from effective use of the concept and also at the problem areas that could lead to failure. It stresses the importance of top management commitment by all the stakeholders, good communications and of giving adequate time to the initial stages and to the partnering workshop. The workshop and the project charter are essential ingredients for success but it postulates that the intention should begin at the inception stage and be communicated to and discussed with all parties prior to their appointment to the project team, whatever format tenders and subsequent contracts take.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | culture, client, partnering, stakeholder, team management, total quality management |
| Index terms: | construction project, evolution, top management, project stakeholder, cultural change, total quality management, ambience, commitment, philosophy, team management, quality management, project team, partnering, satisfaction, workshop, teamwork, procurement strategy |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, factor and component analysis, production management, psychology, contractual arrangements, environmental science, construction type, practitioner, partnership management, sociology, philosophical studies, management, project delivery, evaluation methods |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Sustainability, Procurement, Project Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here