The constraints to effective information flow in the construction management procurement system

Gidado, K and Barter, G (1996) The constraints to effective information flow in the construction management procurement system. Journal of Construction Procurement, 2(2), pp. 52-68. ISSN 1358-9180

Abstract

The construction industry seems to suffer from a general inability to manage design information. The problem is that of a lack of understanding and good communication between design and construction teams. Information is often not delivered from the design team at the right time or in the right form to the contractor to allow construction of the project to time, cost and quality objectives. The process of information flow between designers and construction managers is described in a construction management procurement setting. The constraints affecting the process are identified with regard to achieving project savings in cost and time and quality control. A conceptual model has been developed with a view to aiding effective management of information flow between the designers and construction managers. The concept proposes a model by which information can be effectively managed through the integration of design, selection and construction phases of a project. Literature search, practical experience, and structured interviews with experts in the industry form the basis of the work described in the paper.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction manager, designer, information flow, procurement
Index terms: construction management procurement, design and construction, quality control, construction industry, construction phase, designer, savings, integration, construction manager, interview, design team, information flow
Subjects: contractual arrangements, professional practice, economic analysis, organizational analysis, industry analysis, information systems, profession, data collection methods, project delivery
Topics: Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Quality Management, Procurement, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here