Procurement by objectives

Kumaraswamy, M M and Dissanayaka, S M (1996) Procurement by objectives. Journal of Construction Procurement, 2(2), pp. 38-51. ISSN 1358-9180

Abstract

Many researchers and construction industry analysts have examined the relative merits of options within particular sub-systems of procurement, such as organizational structures or payment modalities. This paper proposes a holistic model of a construction procurement system that provides an overview of the many sub-systems and the various protocols that may be chosen within each such sub-system. A survey of previous research into linkages between construction 'procurement' and project 'performance' leads to the formulation of a second model-which portrays such linkages and also incorporates contributory and intervening variables; and provides the basis for a recently commenced comprehensive investigation into the potential impact of procurement system selection on project performance. A third model is formulated to frame a client advisory system that would facilitate the choice of constructive procurement strategies, based on the strengths of the linkages and relationships that are expected to be elicited from the aforesaid investigation. The basis is thereby demonstrated for selecting a system of compatible and synergistic, project-specific performance-oriented procurement protocols.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: expert system, procurement, project performance, project management, project-specific
Index terms: survey, organizational structure, expert system, procurement strategy, linkage, project management, option, construction industry, procurement system, project performance, investigation, construction procurement
Subjects: contractual arrangements, sociology, decision analysis, data management, industry analysis, project management theory and practice, business, data collection methods
Topics: Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Project Management, Procurement, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 CTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here